Skip to main content

Using Land Insights Skip Tracing with Launch Control: What to Expect & How to Avoid Issues

Some users running Land Insights skip-traced contact data through Launch Control reach out with concerns about data quality, message delivery, or campaign interruptions. This article explains what’s happening, why it occurs, and how to optimize results.

Updated over 2 weeks ago

Important Distinction: Data Quality vs. Campaign Compliance

It’s critical to separate the two different systems:

  • Land Insights Skip Tracing → Provides contact data (phone numbers, emails)

  • Launch Control → Enforces SMS compliance, carrier rules, and risk thresholds

In many cases, the issue is not the accuracy of the contact data itself, but how Launch Control interprets campaign performance signals when sending at scale.


How Skip Tracing Data Works

Land Insights skip tracing pulls from multiple third-party data providers that aggregate:

  • Public records

  • Credit header and utility data

  • Historical ownership and address records

Skip tracing is probability-based, not guaranteed. Even industry-leading providers will return:

  • Some outdated numbers

  • Some wrong-party contacts

  • Some disconnected lines

This is normal across all skip tracing platforms.


Why Issues Can Appear When Using Launch Control

When skip-traced data is used in high-volume texting campaigns, Launch Control may:

  • Auto-flag batches due to short-term spikes in responses

  • Pause campaigns after seeing increased “STOP” or “wrong number” replies

  • Shut down sends due to temporary fluctuations that resolve naturally

These actions are driven by carrier-risk protection, not a determination that the data itself is “bad.”

Key point:

Launch Control’s system is intentionally overcautious by design to protect deliverability and carrier relationships.


Common Scenarios That Trigger Pauses or Flags

Even with valid data, flags may occur due to:

  • Normal variance in response behavior at scale

  • Time-of-day send changes

  • Larger-than-usual batch sizes

  • Campaigns sent to landowners who do not actively use the traced number

A human reviewing the data may see normal fluctuation, while an automated system flags it as a potential risk.


Best Practices When Using Land Insights + Launch Control

To reduce friction and improve performance:

✅ Stagger batch sizes

Avoid sending unusually large batches all at once, especially on new lists.

✅ Warm up campaigns gradually

Introduce new lists or messaging structures incrementally.

✅ Expect variance at scale

Higher volume = more natural fluctuation in responses.

✅ Combine skip tracing with smart filtering

Use Land Insights filters (ownership length, market data, deal indicators) to improve lead quality before skip tracing.


What to Do If You’re Seeing Consistent Problems

If you believe there is a systemic issue (not normal variance), please contact support with:

  • Specific property examples

  • Approximate volume affected

  • Description of the issue (e.g., wrong owner vs. delivery pauses)

This allows us to evaluate whether the issue is:

  • Data-provider related

  • Campaign-structure related

  • Compliance-system related


Final Takeaway

Land Insights skip tracing is designed to save time and scale outreach, but when paired with highly conservative SMS compliance systems like Launch Control, normal data variability can sometimes appear as a “data problem.”

In most cases:

  • The data is working as expected

  • The campaign controls are reacting to short-term signals

  • Adjustments to the send strategy resolve the issue


💬 Questions or need help?

If you have any questions, concerns, or run into issues with ownership data, our support team is here to help.

📧 Email us at: [email protected]

We’re always happy to assist.🤠

Did this answer your question?